Nathan Norman Continues Brutal Twitter Beatdown of Faithless Elector

After reading a weaselly tweet from Faithless Elector Chris Suprun, Nathan Norman resumed his Twitter annihilation of the fraudster, exposing Suprun’s history of lying, cheating, and breaking pledges:

GotNews.com now adds to the growing list of deceitful actions reporting that according to an anonymous classmate, Suprun was expelled from Tarrant County Police Academy 6 years ago for committing plagiarism.

We at IPR-X are on top of this story and will keep you up-to-date with the latest developments until the Electoral College convenes tomorrow.

Nathan Norman’s Twitter Takedown of Faithless Elector

Nathan Norman delivered a knockout punch on Twitter today against Faithless Elector Chris Suprun.  Suprun, a man who reportedly lied about being a first responder on 9/11 and used Ashley Madison to cheat on his wife while the couple had three young children, now refuses to cast his Texas Electoral College vote for Donald Trump despite signing an affidavit pledging to do so.  Suprun apparently lacks integrity.

Trump won the state of Texas in a landslide, entitling him to the states’s 38 electoral votes.  The state Republican Party selected 38 electors, including Suprun, who each pledged to vote for the winner of the state when the College convenes on Monday.  Suprun’s fraud and looming betrayal of the voters of Texas did not sit well with Nathan Norman, who eviscerated Suprun with a series of Tweets:

Donald Trump Says Election Rigged (by Israel?); Billary Whines WikiLeaks (by Russians?).

rwm4prez2016/theplasplace

Yes, the U.S. elections are rigged. Especially the U.S. Presidential elections. But it is of far greater magnitude than ballot box stuffing which is virtually nonexistent or dredging up past alleged indescretions. The very fact that there are only two major candidates, the democrat and republican, and only they are in the Presidential debates, is powerful prima facie evidence of the elections being rigged. Are there really in USA only two major candidates ALMOST ALWAYS, the democrat and the republican? The only significant exceptions in the past 100 years are billionaire H.Ross Perot the Reform party in 1992. And former President Teddy Roosevelt the Progressive party in 1912. Whereas many other nations have several major parties any one of which could be the eventual winner.
Yes, it is quite possible that there is an Israel v Russia competition involving the U.S. Presidential elections.
However, far more important is the influence…

View original post 325 more words