WordPress Deletes Andy Jacobs blog

WordPress removed the Andy Jacobs blog today.  Cyberpig broke the news in IPR comments for an article about Roy Innis:

I deleted him, and it looks like wordpress deleted his blog. About time they did that. Please do not reply to him in the future, it makes the moderators’ job here harder. Out of respect for Roy Innis, if you wish to follow up on that subject please do so in open thread.

Cyberpig continued on the Open Thread:

Maybe whoever got wordpress to take down the fake Knappster and Andy Jacobs blogs could do the same with Vernon’s blog? That one is still up there from 2+ years ago with all the same WordPress terms of service violations. WordPress was informed of it and for whatever reason did not do anything (and still hasn’t). Email me if you don’t want to talk about it on here. My email address is in the about IPR tab at the top. Yeah, they can keep putting the same crap up on more new blogs but we can keep having them taken down too.

Of course, this is all smoke and mirrors since we know Cyberpig is behind Vernon’s blog.  That’s why Vernon’s blog remains standing after all these years while the Knappster and Andy Jacobs blogs are defunct.

Thomas L. Knapp Warming Up to Trump?

In Episode 108 of the Knapp Stir Podcast, Thomas L. Knapp declares that President Elect Donald Trump may not be as bad as he previously thought.  He praises Trump’s cabinet selections of James “Mad Dog” Mattis for Secretary of Defense, Betsy DeVos for Secretary of Education, and John Kelly for Secretary of Homeland Security.  Knapp also reveals his elderly father suffered a fall over the weekend.  We at IPR-X wish him all the best and hope he gets well soon.

Listen to the show below:

I should be credited as a Producer of the Knapp Stir Podcast

For the past nine episodes of Thomas L. Knapp’s Knapp Stir Podcast, I have served a pivotal role.  In many ways, I should be credited as a producer of the show.  A large majority of the content from these past episodes either comes from me directly or my surrogates on topics I want Knapp to discuss.  This is done through Knapp’s “Thanks for Asking” threads for which he devotes most of the podcast.  Topics I had Knapp discuss included the Thin White Duke David Bowie, 2016 FPP Peace Prize winner and Libertarians for Trump founder Walter Block, conspiracy theorist and possible government agent Andy Jacobs, Cyberpig Paulie Frankel and his failing health, Knapp’s excessive profanity, PLAS Place founder Robert Milnes, and PizzaGate.  Although I started off disliking Knapp, he is starting to grow on me.  Even though I usually disagree with everything he says, I have begun to enjoy his podcasts.  For that reason, I’m proud to be a major contributor.

To better understand this situation, let me go deeper into the backstory.

I first commented on the knappster blog on the October 5 “Thanks for Asking” thread.  I asked a question, it was deleted, and I was banned from the site.  IPR (from which I and many others are banned) has people like Knapp, who think of me as a terrible person since I dared to be different and challenged libertarian orthodoxy.  These people have a hare trigger to ban me where ever I may comment.  On October 9, Knapp discussed me (for the first time I believe) on Episode 99 of the Knapp Stir Podcast, and he was particularly nasty.  As a result, I wrote an article for the Grand Inquirer called “The Corruption of Thomas L. Knapp,” discussing Knapp’s big ego, failures in politics, and questionable activities as an IPR moderator.  Afterwards, Robert Milnes questioned on the October 13 “Thanks for Asking” thread why my October 5 question was censored and left unanswered.  Knapp answered Milnes insufficiently and inaccurately.  During Episode 100 of the Knapp Stir Podcast, Knapp read Milnes’ question, repeated the answer, and then announced that Milnes had been banned from the site.  The next week, as documented at IPR-X, Harry Areola asked a series of questions.  In his answer and on Episode 101, Knapp decreed that anyone who discussed me or Robert Milnes would be banned.  I continued listening to the podcasts and instructed my surrogates to ask certain questions.  I was hoping to find out more about Knapp for new Grand Inquirer story ideas.  The only story I formulated in this time period was “Thomas L. Knapp Goes ‘Full-Retard’,” discussing Knapp’s vote for Gary Johnson and subsequent decision to take a photo of his ballot, in effect making a permanent record of his idiocy.  Nevertheless, as the episodes went on I realized I was actually enjoying the shows.  I began looking forward to Sunday, when the shows came out.  I now know that that is because I have had effective control over the content and for that I thank Knapp.  I thank Knapp for allowing me to make his show entertaining.  For that reason, the knappster blog will now be added to my blogroll.

Enjoy these podcasts for which I should be credited as Producer:

 

Areola Interviews Thomas L. Knapp

Interview took place today on knappster blogspot article Thanks For Asking! — 10/17/16

Harry Areola: Are you running the knappster wordpress blog?  https://knappsterblog.wordpres…

Thomas L. Knapp: Thanks for asking!

No, that blog is a troll project by the group that’s also been trolling my Thanks For Asking! threads — a group of which I’m going to tentatively assume you are a member.

Harry Areola: No. No. I am not a member. My brother Marlon is though.

In other news, who would you nominate for the Supreme Court?

Thomas L. Knapp: SCOTUS? If I got to nominate the entire court, I would probably pick nine figures from Madam Tussaud’s Wax Museum — Colbert and nine random picks, preferably all female pop stars.

Harry Areola: Who did you vote for/support in every general/primary election since you were born?

Harry Areola: For president that is.

Thomas L. Knapp: I had mild opinions prior to being able to vote (when I was ten I didn’t like Ford because he was bald and so I preferred Carter).

The presidential elections I have voted in:

  • 1988: No primary vote, Dukakis in the general election.
  • 1992: No primary vote, carried petitions as a volunteer for Perot, voted for Perot in November.
  • 1996: Supported Tompkins for the Libertarian nomination, voted for Browne in the general election.
  • 2000: Supported Gorman for the Libertarian nomination, voted for Browne in the general election.
  • 2004: Supported Russo for the Libertarian nomination, voted for Badnarik in the general election.
  • 2008: Supported Steve Kubby (and after he was eliminated Mary Ruwart) for the Libertarian nomination, voted for McKinney in the general election.
  • 2012: Supported no candidates, cast no votes.
  • 2016: Supported Darryl W. Perry for the Libertarian nomination, undecided as to who I’ll vote for next month if I vote in the presidential election (likely choices include a write-in for Perry, abstaining, or possibly Johnson or Stein).

Harry Areola: Okay. My last question for now. Do you think the William Stinglen death scene was fake?

See rwm4prez2012.wordpress.com/201…

Thomas L. Knapp: Thanks for asking!

  1. I’ve never heard of William Stinglen;
  2. I don’t read Robert Milnes’s web site;
  3. People who make a habit of linking to Robert Milnes’s web site or otherwise referring to him, to Nathan Norman, et al., won’t remain welcome here.