Cyberpig Fails Miserably in Attempt to Frame & Ban Andy

pigman_by_vindrea-dbvbfth

Cyberpig Paulie Frankel failed in his attempt yesterday to frame and ban Andy Jacobs from IPR over the use of ALLCAPS.

Posting under Andy’s name, Cyberpig called Anastasia Beaverhausen a “massive CUNT,” which he believed would provide justification to ban Andy for using ALLCAPS.  He then pretended to give Andy one last chance:

Andy you have been specifically told not to use CAPS in that manner. If you do it again, I will have no choice but to ban you for life.

To this, Cyberpig as Andy responded “FUCK YOU CUCK MOULTON! FUKC YOU SEEBECK! FUCK YOU PAUL!” Thus Cyberpig decreed “Andy is hereby banned from IPR. Further comments from him will be removed.”

Andy rightfully denied he made the posts and argued:

the ban on all caps has not been enforced, as I have seen others do it here and nobody said anything about it. Banning speech for type size is irrational.

IPR owner Warren Redlich did not buy any of Cyberpig’s lies.  He did not enforce Andy’s ban, which then angered the Cyberpig, who then claimed someone was impersonating him and vented his frustration at the IPR administrators who fail to enforce his war on font sizes, complaining like the cuck he is:

All-caps are considered the equivalent of shouting on the internet and as such net etiquette is usually to ask people not to do it. It’s only when that request is ignored often enough and in large enough doses that rules get issued. I’m sad to hear that no one has been enforcing IPR’s policy about all caps in my absence.

It’s a real shame and very low class that the Cyberpig attempted to use an obituary post to frame and ban Andy.  The article was about the untimely death of Libertarian great Steve Gordon.  Steve was a good man. Originally he was going to help organize all the Bob Barr and Newt Gingrich supporters from Georgia to storm the 2016 convention in Orlando and nominate Nathan Norman for president. Unfortunately this did not materialize, but in hindsight, I’m glad it didn’t. The Libertarian Party in its current state is a joke.

Rest in peace Steve.  I hope you can forgive the Cyberpig’s bad behavior.

Angry Andy Destroys Cyberpig & Cuck Moulton in Epic Rant

raygordy

Andy Jacobs is tired of the liberal bullshit on IPR (and in the Libertarian Party).  Leftist cucks have made the site unreadable and as a result it has become a barren wasteland of nothingness (with the exception of Andy’s excellent comments).

Andy was in rare form today when he went after the Cyberpig for being an ungrateful asshole and accused Cuck Moulton of masturbating on petitions he had gathered.  Andy destroyed both of these liberal cucks for attempting to ban him from the site just for holding actual libertarian positions.    Check this out:

You see the true colors of the so called “libertarian” phonies here. Somebody calls for my “physical removal” for daring to disagree with them on an issue. So much for free speech and open discourse. This is a sign of somebody who can’t handle having their ideas challenged.

And then Paul (Cyberpig), a person I have helped on numerous occasions, with financial loans, work opportunities, rides to hospitals, visits in jail, etc…, answers with a very weak, “I don’t know. You’d have to ask IPR editors..” Paul knows. He doesn’t give a shit because he does not like the fact that I am challenging his leftist agenda. So he does not care about all the times I loaned him money, went out of my way to give him rides, hooked him up with places to stay, hooked him up with work opportunities, etc… None of that matter as much as his leftist agenda. I rwally have to question whether Paul is even really interested in liberty, and the same goes with a few other people here.. The answer to the question should be a resounding no. I have done absolutely nothing wrong, and I intend to continue as is.

I am going to keep on challenging bad ideas, weak logic, and unprincipled stands. I do not believe in sacred cows. I despise intellectual cowards. I am going to challenge you in the arena of thought.

I have busted my ass for the Libertarian Party and the overall cause of liberty for many years, and at great personal sacrifice. I just recently turned down a chance to do petition work in Washington. A Michael Bloomberg backed petition came out there for $7 a signature, which is a high rate (there we’re other petitions as well). I could have made a lot of money getting signatures for a new gun control law, but I did not go, out of devotion to principle. Instead, I went to Virginia, and then Pennsylvania, to work LP for less money. I worked two festivals over the last several days where I got a lot of signatures, but not as many as I could have gotten because it rained for several hours one day. I also handed out a lot of LP flyers, all of which were paid for out of my pocket, and I gathered a few contacts from peolke i encountered who said they were interested (done for no extra pay). It got pretty hot on Sunday, which made it pretty incomfortable to stand outside that long. I have also gobe out of my way to get LP of PA to put in a better effort at getting their district office candidates on the ballot, something they have not done a very good job at for the last 10 years. It looks like this year, thanks in part to my pushing them to get a complete list of all of the district candidates earlier in tge process, they might finally be making some progress in that area.

I have gone to jail twice (on false charges, all of which ended up getting dropped), for this cause. I have turned down a lot of higher paying work for this cause. I have spent a considerable amount of my own money for this cause. I have probably handed out more Libertarian Party, and general libertarian, materials (flyers, pamphlets, VHS tapes, DVD’s, bumper stickers, etc…, to the public than anybody, and some of this has been done at my own expense.

I have probably donated more contacts of interested members of the public to the party than anyone (outside of maybe a high profile candidate, but a lot of them do not even bother to do that). I even donated some contacts I gathered while doing LP petition signatures in Virginia back when the ungrateful two-faced weasel Cuck Moulton was the State Chair (a candidate paid for the drive, but I donated the co. Cuck knows that I donated those contacts to him, because I handed to him in person at the LP of Pennsylvania State Convention in June of 2013. Cuck was friendly to my face at the time. A quick way to lose my respect us by being a two-faced backstabbing weasel. I Do not like fake people. I don’t like fake libertarians, and I do not like people who act friendly to your face, but then stab you in the back. People who behave in such manner are pieces of shit. It would not surprise me if the contacts I gathered in Virginia in 2013 from people who said that they wanted to be contacted by the LP ended up at the bottom of Cuck’s birdcage, or maybe he jacked off on them. One would think that people who are supposedly interested in growing the LP and winning elections and changing the course of politics in this country would be appreciative of efforts such as this, but not guys like Cuck. Cuck Moulton is an example of why the Libertarian Party is not more successful.

It is really rather disgusting to see the actions and attitudes of some of the people in the LP, and while I still think that the party has a good philosophy and consists mostly of well meaning people, there are So many people in tbe party who are disappointments as people that it is no wonder that the party is not more successful.

When Post-Libertarianism Becomes the New Libertarianism

lpremovealtright

I noticed a while back Cyberpig Paulie Frankel expressed a desire to cede the “Libertarian” name to the Alt-Right.  He feels the strong Alt-Right presence in the Libertarian Party and its support of President Donald Trump has caused the term to be too closely associated with the Right.  Cyberpig now wants his views to be labeled as “Liberal.”  This makes perfect sense since “Liberal” fits best with the weird hybrid SJW/Anarchist views he espouses under his IPR persona.

This all got me thinking.  A few months ago, I declared Libertarianism dead.  I saw many previous libertarians like Stefan Molyneux, Richard Spencer, Chris Cantwell, and Augustus Invictus take the logical step after libertarianism to the Alt-Right.  But if many post-libertarians remain part of the Libertarian Party, doesn’t that mean they actually become the libertarians?

I am now rethinking my decision to leave the Libertarian Party.  If being Libertarian now means accepting reality, i.e. people have equal rights but not all races, cultures, religions or genders have equal value, then count me back in.  I am currently a member of the American Freedom Party and the Modern Whig Party, but these parties don’t seem to be going anywhere.  I am seriously considering rejoining the Libertarian Party and perhaps, once more, seeking its presidential nomination.  We’ll see how it goes.

 

In Remembrance

black-cancer-ribbon

Today is 9/11.  It was on this day we suffered a major attack . . .

Of course, as everyone knows, today marks the three year anniversary of Cyberpig’s destruction of the Functional Fillmore Frugal Movement website in a cowardly act of political censorship.  This marked the end of the fledgling Functional Fillmore Frugal movement, which was on its way to becoming a major force within the Libertarian Party.  Like the movement, however, libertarianism is now dead.

Those of you who want to relive the glory days of the Functional Fillmore Frugal Movement can access a mirror of the website at http://functionalfillmorefrugal.blogspot.com/.  It is there as it was on the day it was wrongfully deleted.

Let’s keep in mind, the movement was not all for naught.  Like a phoenix, from the ashes of the Functional Fillmore Frugal Movement, the Millard Fillmore Remembrance Project will rise.  Stay tuned for updates.

Fillmore

It’s Coming!

 

Did Gary Johnson Use My Idea to Win Votes?

marstransitionv

Over at The Other Place, on a story about Transhumanist Zoltan Istvan, “Just Saying” writes:

I can see it now. Once the Libertarians accept Zoltan and transhumanism — don’t laugh, they embraced Goofy Gary, who once suggested on national television that the solution to global warming was space colonization — the party will have to come up with a new slogan.

First of all, concerning the actual story, I like Zoltan Istvan.  He is using the correct, scientific approach to politics.  Hopefully that means he will also embrace pro-White positions since these are entirely based on scientific realism.  While Zoltan has no realistic chance of winning as a Libertarian, I hope his run for Governor of California awakens the masses to science-based politics.  Gary Johnson AKA “Goofy Gary” was foolish for passing on Zoltan for his running mate in 2016, choosing statist Bill Weld instead (thus creating the embarrassing Weld my Johnson ticket).

The comment on IPR from “Just Saying” alerted me to something I did not know. Apparently, Gary Johnson’s 2016 approach to climate change was exactly the same as the approach I first put forward in 2014:

 It is indisputable that climate change will soon make Earth unlivable, but we shouldn’t pretend we can do anything to reverse it. Ultimately, we will choose either to perish with the Earth or find a new home. Given our limited capabilities Mars may be our only option.

Last September, Gary Johnson used this idea of dealing with climate change through human relocation during an interview on This Week:

“We do have to inhabit other planets. The future of the human race is space exploration,” Johnson told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos on “This Week” in offering a response on how to address the challenges posed by climate change.

I did not know Johnson took this position on climate change.  It obviously came from me, since I too was a contender for Libertarian Party’s 2016 presidential nomination, and so, I was on Johnson’s radar.  I wonder how many other ideas Johnson took from me.  I have no way of verifying this, but perhaps my ideas are the reason Johnson’s vote percentage took such a jump from the 0.99% he won in 2012 to the 3.3% he won in 2016.  If that is true, imagine how much the party would have won if I was the nominee rather than Goofy Gary.

Perhaps it is for the better that that did not happen.  Libertarianism turned out to be dead.  And Donald Trump winning the election was best for the nation and White people in particular.  In fact, a Trump presidency will make it easier to implement the agenda I put forward during the 2016 campaign:

  • Trump’s pro-energy platform and plan to improve our relationship with Russia will make it easier to put together a joint U.S.-Russia operation to Frack Siberia to fund space exploration
  • Trump’s creation of economic prosperity and commitment to space exploration will help enable a return to the Moon (by 2020, according to Trump) and move us closer to putting a man on Mars, which we can then terraform and inhabit.  According to Andy Aldrin, “Sound market economics can be a real strong foundation to launching a mission to Mars and human habitation to Mars.”
  • California’s aversion to Trump’s policies, a consequence of California’s rejection of realism (and ultimately why they will reject Zoltan), is already fostering a secessionist movement.  California’s secession would have the same effect as splitting California because it too would lessen the overinfluence of California on national policy and make it easier to put in place nationalist policies that benefit the entire nation.

These things might not happen but they are much more likely under Trump than any other president in recent history.

Sarwark Sees Justification for Violence at UC Berkeley Riot

15027387_908199735980048_5027143225185422911_n

Libertarian National Committee chairman Nicholas Sarwark says the rioters at UC Berkeley were justified to use violence last week to prevent “dangerous faggot” Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking due to Milo’s “despicable” speech.  Sarwark said this after believing a fake news report that Milo was going to use his speech to list the names of UC Berkeley students in the country illegally.  He tried to save face by double-talking and calling the use of violence to silence speech as also “despicable”, but Sarwark is wrong to argue moral equivalency between violent riots and peaceful speech.  Even though Sarwark’s premise is all wrong, his defense of the violence shows his priorities, priorities shared by many in the now-dead libertarian movement.

Sarwark and his “Weekend at Bernie’s” followers favor protecting illegal aliens over protecting free speech. Apparently that’s what it means to be Libertarian now days. That is one reason libertarianism died. The Libertarian Party is no longer the party of the White man.  It is the party of illegal aliens and homosexuals.

Many let Sarwark know what they thought of his comments on Facebook. Breitbart published an article displaying a few of them.

Shane Trejo:

Milo is not a coward like so many Libertarians clearly are… because of smug full-of-shit pussies like Nicholas Sarwark, no self-respecting person can call even publicly themselves a libertarian these days without feeling embarrassed.

Chad Chaderson:

It seems like ‘libertarian,’ for many, is just a code word for social justice warrior.

Milo Yiannopoulos:

this idiot should stick to what libertarians actually know about — weed, Bitcoin and hacking — and leave slanderous rumor where it belongs. On CNN.

Here’s some more comments taking Sarwark to task.

Duke Becher:

So is the chairman for or against free speech and liberty? Getting hard to tell…

Robert Woods:

The fact that you are trying to excuse violence is despicable behavior. You can denounce Milo’s rhetoric while also denouncing the violence. You could then speak on proposals for immigration reform and not toss out the heart tugger about “destroying people’s lives,” which points to flaws when it comes to libertarian foreign policy. Will sending a undocumented person back to their home country actually destroy their life?
You are unpacking the box from the wrong end. We must first remove negative incentives for immigration before reverting immigration laws. Are you ok with undocumented students using federal tax dollars for their education?

Steven Sadowski:

The one thing I could always count on from the libertarian party was a sense of principle. It’s OK to make mistakes. It’s human, but to continue to deny that you got the story wrong, or more accurately, cannot prove your allegation is troubling. Aren’t you a lawyer? Please, just apologize, and let’s move on.

Pete Walker:

Not that, that particular outlet would have been the best option but you damn right he should call out illigals, there is a legal way of entering this country, and by undermining that process you essentially are telling the o es that came here LEGALLY “oh well, too bad you obeyed the law of he land sucker, you should have done it illigally and saved the money and paperwork!” And by using violence to disrupt the speech is atrocious ! Anyone who supports that behavior should be imprisoned along with the perpetrators. You fuckin morons still don’t understand why Trump got elected in the first place. WE THE PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF YOUR BULLSHIT !! WE THE PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF BEING TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF !! Paul Stanton stop supporting this ideology, if you ever want to ACTUALLY be elected into office in ANY capacity……

Patrick Bermudez:

Time for you to go Nicholas Sarwark, you are pushing the wrong agendas.

you are part of that group who calls themselves libertarians while guzzling subsidies, earmarks, monopoly, and corporatist crony partnerships from the hated “gubmint” then turn around and demand that the taxpayer bail out any fall out from these violations of market theory. You are turning the LP into a laughing stock.

The new “Libertarian Party” has a confused history on what libertarianism is. They have previously had individuals run for president like Bob Barr, a former Congressman who voted for the USA PATRIOT Act and the invasion of Iraq. Given this fact, it’s not entirely surprising that the party had a Hillary Clinton apologist run for vice president.

National LP policies have driven away many
normal intelligent common sense libertarians,
and is starting to resemble a cult.

Garion Ford:

The LP does seem to have been highjacked by SJW. it makes debates rather interesting with friends when I have crap thrown at me from my own party that sounds like it came from Sen Bernie Sanders.

Shane Trejo:

its one thing to not be a prick to immigrants. its another to spew baseless horseshit in a desperate attempt to virtue signal to leftists, which is what sarwark did with this post. and of course, he’s too much of an arrogant prick to admit how full of shit he is.

Your pathetic joke a political party won’t be getting any better, coward. Especially with lousy, worthless activists like yourself. That’s for sure.

Chad Chaderson:

you guys keep defending tranny bathrooms and siding with SJWs and we’ll stick to fighting for causes that actually matter.

Israel Anderson:

I sure hope this will be your last term as LNC Chair.

Scotty Sedlak:

Mr. Sarwark, I applaud you as a person who is doing (from what I can see) an excellent job of leading the Libertarian Party. But while I identify most as a libertarian, one of the main reasons I will not have anything to do with the LP is the stance on open borders. I totally agree that people should have freedom of movement to and from the country, but to ignore the threats that most certainly exist from foreign countries and individuals in order to inflate that idea of free travel to utopian levels is dangerous and foolish. There must be a border, they must be secure, and there must be knowledge of who is entering and why. To do otherwise is to wholly ignore the mandate of national defense which is one of the main reasons for the mutual union of States. With that said, a law stating that entering the country without proper authorization is a crime must also be enforced. Otherwise, the rule of law in a nation of laws does not exist. No matter how you personally feel, the law must be followed. If you don’t like the law, change it, don’t ignore it. And the law prescribes that those entering the country illegally must be deported. You can despise Mr. Yionnopoulos all you like, but I will not subscribe to a feel good system where government is based on emotion instead of logic.

Matt Nichols:

What an embarrassment for Libertarians. Take this SJW crap back to Tumblr and let’s get someone who won’t peddle this cultural Marxism under the guise of Liberty anymore

Sarah Copeland:

Are you intentionally ignorant, or is this purely by accident that you are spewing fiction that you’re trying to pass off as fact in a blatant attempt to gain favor with the progressive social justice warriors? Either you don’t have a clue what you’re doing, or you understand perfectly what you’re doing which makes it even worse. Step down and let someone with a spine and a set of balls lead the party.

David Larmore:

So, the libertarian party is engaging in spreading fake news, rumor and innuendo now?

No, it doesn’t explain violence. There’s no excuse for violence. Fake news, rumor and innuendo is no justification and/or logical reason for violence.

Bryan Burns:

Ok…let me try to follow. The guy who wrote this post, used unsubstantiated rumors in order to justify, or give a picture to feeble minded people of an “explanation” to riot in order to disrupt the free speech guaranteed in the constitution of these United States…
After using these rumors as an “explanation” to riot to stop free speech, his answer is that government has too much power. Apparently not caring that there is no protection of the free speech of the person he disagrees with, calls the person an asshole… because he is going to rat out people here illegally. After all, borders are imaginary lines.
Then I see someone on this thread using the fact that native Americans lands were stolen from them as a defense of some libertarian cause. Apparently, people came here across imaginary borders, stole their lands, infected them with various diseases, and they were relegated to second class citizens in their own land. Those open borders always worked out great for the white oppressors…didn’t it? Lol.
Some things are great in principle but leave results that are less than idea when implemented in the real world. There has to be some common sense. Free speech has to be protected or you give government the means to orchestrate riots in order to shut people up. Don’t think it would happen? Read the history books…the ones written before being rewritten for left wing agendas. Protest is GREAT. But never try to “explain” the destruction of others property and the denial of free speech to defend someone else’s right to be someplace illegally. It may be against libertarian principles to require any person to be denied entry for any reason (whether to farm or to blow up a city) but to destroy the very foundations of freedom of speech and property rights in order to obtain that imaginary unobtained principle is a dangerous thing. Work to make sensible immigration laws by reasonably swaying people, but not through unsubstantiated rumors and “explaining” away people’s violence ad destructive behavior. You will definitely lose those who have common sense

Joe Bonner:

This is why the libertarian party will never go anywhere. No, scratch that, this is why the libertarian party will remain a running joke.

“I mean look guys, its understandable that someone would throw Molotov cocktails at a Milos event over an unsubstantiated rumor made up after the fact, but like, what they should really so is vote against immigration laws.”

They did, they voted democrat. And no, they will never switch over to you because of your stance on cutting healthcare and welfare.

Greg Wainwright:

Sweet. Hey what’s your address? I think I’m going to move in to your house without asking. I’ll eat your food, use your utilities, and I’m going to hop on your health insurance plan. Oh, and I don’t speak your language so I’m going to have ask you and your family to change your customs and language to match mine. Sound good? I’ll be there by morning. You won’t even know I’m there. I’m not going to harm anyone.

Gage Czajkowski:

This is exactly why I left the libertarian party because of leftists like you who care more about the rights of illegals than the rights of American people

Parker G. Ward:

This is our Chairman folks. 1. Defends Bill Weld 2. Criticized Dr. Ron Paul, while defending Bill Weld. 3. Post a lie. 4. Defends the violence of the riots

Richard Dunkin:

I guess I know why I’ve never seen you discuss your absurd position with Stefan Molyneux. You don’t factor in the presence of a welfare state in the US. You also don’t factor in the lower average IQs of most 3rd world immigrants. The libertarian utopia you seek will never exist if you lower the nations average IQ by just a few points to the low 90s. I am amazed how the LP has changed to full on globalist. If you keep this up, you will never get my vote for president again, and I’ve voted LP for president 5 times in my life.

Doris D’Antonio:

Oh my God, I thought they were extinct. I guess they’re not. As per this, there is at least one total asshole left on the planet.

Make your voice heard.  Tell Sarwark what you think about his comment.

Then, do your country a favor and report any illegal aliens you know to ICE at 866-347-2423 or report them online.

Libertarians, it’s somewhat sad that libertarianism is dead, but there are ways to move on.  Bury the libertarian corpse and join us in the Alt-Right.  The American Freedom Party is a good place to start.

The Death of Libertarianism

Libertarianism was cool for a little while. It brought us Ron and Rand Paul, a way to oppose stupid wars without being leftist and a message that made us all feel good inside. Then we all witnessed as it became unworkable. A doofus stoner became the standard bearer, and embarrased himself and the movement. The “Libertarian” Party turned into a hotbed of social justice warriors and homosexuals. It cheered as the Supreme Court forced Americans to subsidize sodomy and ignored the real issues of illegal immigration, crime, and White genocide.

In the past year or so many of us abandoned libertarianism. Something better took its place. The frog emoji replaced the porcupine.  We started frequenting 4chan instead of Reason. And we all shaved our beards, cut our hair and got fashy haircuts. The Alt-Right was born when libertarianism died.

Many libertarians still don’t know their movement is dead. But it’s over. It died when it abandoned its base, the educated White men of America.  IPR and others still parade the corpse of libertarianism around with sunglasses as if it lives. But it’s starting to stink and it’s getting really sad. That’s the difference between IPR and IPR-X. We recognize reality while IPR is stuck in the past.

IPR readers and contributors, please bury the body. I ask you to join us here at IPR-X. We are the present and the future.